A report on the controversies of affirmative action

A Debate, New York: University of Chicago Press, The Medical School provided no evidence that the best way it could contribute to increased medical services to underserved communities was to employ a racially preferential admissions scheme. According to Kmiec, there are two main reasons why affirmative action is an undesirable public policy.

Controversies in Affirmative Action

Preferring members of any one group for no reason other than race or ethnic origin is discrimination for its own sake. First, John Rawls published in A Theory of Justice, an elaborate, elegant, and inspiring defense of a normative theory of justice Rawls Social Justice or Reverse Discrimination.

This means two states have now banned affirmative action programs in state agencies by the direct vote of citizens. Nevertheless, it is the wrong strategy for defending real world affirmative action. The diversity that furthers a compelling state interest encompasses a far broader array of qualifications and characteristics of which racial or ethnic origin is but a single though important element.

Contentious Ideas and Controversial Practices John Michael Eden and John Paul Ryan From university admissions offices to the board rooms of corporate America, few questions are as subject to dissent and heated discussion as affirmative action.

Hochschild argues that although economic dominance, psychological dynamics, and cultural conditioning all play a significant role, focusing on these causes of racism is unproductive. That Supreme Court decision sent universities nationwide scrambling to find alternative methods other than quotas for admitting racially diverse student classes.

Race, Class, and the Soul of the Nation. Few arenas have been as hotly contested in recent years as admission to public colleges and universities. However, he also directs that outreach and recruitment programs for minority hiring should be intensified. Ethnic Equality and Public Policy.

What is I-O?

Any mandate to increase their representation on campus would require more diligent searches by universities, to be sure, but searches fated nevertheless largely to mirror past results. University of Chicago Press, For instance, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, an African American, has publicly acknowledged his opposition to affirmative action, much to the dismay of civil rights groups.

In Julya federal district court encouraged the State of Alabama to discontinue discrimination against blacks in the hiring of state troopers. According to DeJorna, gaps in such quality-of-life measures as college enrollment and graduation rates, opportunities for employment and advancement, and lifelong earning potential, speak to the continued need for affirmative action.

His vote, added to the four votes of the Stevens group, meant that Allan Bakke won his case and that Powell got to write the opinion of the Court.

Thus, affirmative action increase the female population in the director position. Inhis case, Regents of the University of California v. Affirmative Action puts in place a set of incentives that move us toward equally-qualified men, women, and minorities in the work place.

All Rights Reserved Hit Counter The integrative model of affirmative action offers an alternative rationale for race—sensitive admissions that unites educational with democratic and social justice concerns. Because cases challenging AAPs adopted under Executive Order typically settle within the Labor Department's administrative review mechanisms, it is possible that such programs may escape direct judicial pronouncement.

Age and disability are made relevant in this manner—in the one case, by the social purpose of assuring that people do not have to live in poverty when they can no longer work; in the other case, by the social purpose of assuring that people are not foreclosed from developing and marketing their talents by impediments in the largely constructed physical environment.

A white house report prepared by Clinton contends that discrimination had not been sufficiently eradicated from American society to justify the end of affirmative action (Deke, ). The issues of the target of the affirmative action remain controversial up to date.

Affirmative Action: Twenty-five Years of Controversy. By Claire Andre, Manuel Velasquez, and Tim Mazur. White House Counsel C. Borden Gray created a furor last November when, on the eve of the President's signing a major civil rights bill designed to "fight the evils of discrimination," he circulated a directive to end the use of racial preferences and quotas in federal government hiring.

Controversy surrounding the constitutionality of affirmative action programs has made the topic one of heated debate. Background on Affirmative Action. Affirmative action is an outcome of the 's Civil Rights Movement, intended to provide equal opportunities for members of minority groups and women in education and employment.

Controversy surrounding the constitutionality of affirmative action programs has made the topic one of heated debate. Background on Affirmative Action.

Controversies in Affirmative Action

Affirmative action is an outcome of the 's Civil Rights Movement, intended to provide equal opportunities for members of minority groups and women in education and employment.

The Affirmative Action Controversy "[racial discrimination must not only be detected, but it must also be remedied.

In practice, this requires that the courts and other in. The ebb and flow of public controversy over affirmative action can be pictured as two spikes on a line, the first spike representing a period of passionate debate that began around and tapered off afterand the second indicating a resurgence of debate in the s leading up to Supreme Court’s decisions in and upholding certain kinds of affirmative action.

A report on the controversies of affirmative action
Rated 0/5 based on 7 review
Controversial issues of the affirmative action Essay – Free Papers and Essays Examples